1 the value of the property further as the
2 density allotment goes up.
3
4 A Um-hum.
5 Q So the SkyTrain is going to increase the value of
6 the property?
7 A On that particular property —
34 Q So by chance Ms. Hundley’s three properties are
35 all under-assessed and the Garniers’ are
36 over-assessed?
37 A Well, the — the Garniers’ property, in my early
38 testimony, was assessed an increase of $112,000
Mr.Hunter examination for discovery day 2 April 14, 2010
Page 252
4 1382 Q How is it that Ms. Hundley’s properties have all
5 gone up from the assessment value but the
6 Garniers’ have gone down? What are your feelings
7 about that?
8 MR. BLANCHARD: Don’t answer that.
Lucy Hundley trial transcripts about Mr.Hunter’s March 19, 2007 letter to her.
12 Lucy Hundley (the Plaintiff)In chief by Mr. McKendrick
32 Q All right. If you could turn to page 14, please,
33 in that book. Do you recognize that document?
34 A Yes. That’s a letter that Ray would have given me
35 to do with costs for redevelopment.
36 Q All right.
37 A And how much square footage I would be allowed to
38 build on the property.
39 Q Now, would you just tell the court please what —
40 what you took from that letter, how important it
41 was to you? What the point of it was that — what
42 part did it play in your decision making and, et
43 cetera?
44 A Well, that I was going to — I felt confident of
45 going ahead with this. The — I could meet those
46 costs and I’m — I was quite confident that I
47 could sell the units.
Hundley testified she gave Mr. Hunter’s March 19,2007 letter to her bank
71 Lucy Hundley (the Plaintiff) (Recalled)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison
21 Q Okay. If I could have you turn to page 14. Do
22 you recognize this document? It’s a three-page
23 document.
24 A Mm’hmm.
25 Q Do you recognize this?
26 A Well, it’s addressed to me.
27 Q And that was your address at the time?
28 A Yup. So I — I presume that was all given to me.