19 agency contract with her
Mr. Hunter’s trial transcripts Vol. 4
602 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison
43 Q Now, what you’re saying is that you attend their
44 home. Did they ask you what Ms. Hundley would
45 accept, or what was she willing to pay?
46 A No.
47 Q Why didn’t you attend the property with an offer
603 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison
1 from Ms. Hundley?
2 A Well, at that particular point in time, we — it
3 was at an early stage in the development.
14 Q Wouldn’t it seem more efficient to come with an
16 A No.
604 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison
6 Q But what if it — what if it was expired at a
7 million — a million 2?
8 A Well, wouldn’t be interested.
Mr. Hunter’s Trial Transcripts Vol. 4.
663 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party) Cross-exam by Mr.Davison
20 Q But nowhere do you have any evidence other than
21 your testimony that you told the Garnier that you
22 were, A, already working for Ms.Hundley, and B,
23 going to be acting as a dual agent with them on
24 the February 8th meeting?
25 A In relation to your question, I don’t know how it
26 would be possible to prove that, unless, as I
27 said, you literally had a recording device on the
29 Q Do you think getting the limited dual agency
30 agreement signed on February 8th would be proof?
31 A Again, the limited dual agency situation was
32 premature on the 8th.
38 Q To answer my question, though, do you feel it
39 would be proof that you told the Garniers that
40 you, A, were acting for Ms.Hundley, the potential
41 buyer, and B, acting in a dual agency situation
42 had you gotten them to signed a limited dual
43 agency agreement on February —
44 A It’s irrelevant. The limited dual agency document
45 was not called for or required on the 8th because
46 the situation simply had not developed.
664 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party)Cross-exam by Mr.Davison
5 MR. DAVISON:
6 Q When you attended the Garniers, you were acting as