Our Story

39 explore it.

40 MR. BLANCHARD: My Lord, I think I must join the fray

41 at this point. This seems to be all directed to

42 Mr. Hunter. There is no pleading in the third

43 party notice that alleges a second contract, or,

44 indeed, suggests that the contract between the

45 plaintiff and the defendants is unenforceable for

46 some sort of defect. Frankly, my friend has by

47 specific request seen the original of the document

56 Lucy Hundley (the Plaintiff) (Recalled)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison

1 that all of the parties signed. I have it here.

2 This is really some sort of process of discovery

3 to an issue that’s not relevant from the

4 pleadings. And I agree with my friend,

5 Mr. McKendrick, that this is a substantial waste

6 of the court’s time.

27 Q Okay. Are they the same in your opinion?

28 A No.

58 Lucy Hundley (the Plaintiff) (Recalled)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison

17 MR. DAVISON: Okay. And is it possible that this —

18 certainly, at the one sitting when you put this

19 document together — we’ll say the one that’s in

20 this joint book of documents — that’s what we

21 refer to it as — that’s the only original we have

22 right now, so we’ll refer to that.

23 THE COURT: That’s fine.


25 Q Yes. In the big binder. You recall signing that

26 one. You didn’t sign two at the same time, right?

27 You would recall that?

28 A I don’t believe so.

29 Q Okay. And you don’t recall signing this contract

30 of purchase and sale at a later date?

31 A Well, I don’t — I know that there was signing

32 because of changes to the contract.

33 Q And, but that’s an addendum; is that fair to say?

34 Or do you recall there actually — you resigning

35 another contract?

36 A I don’t recall.

61 Lucy Hundley (the Plaintiff) (Recalled)Cross-exam by Mr. Davison

1 apologize, I think that’s one of them that’s gone.

2 The one that is — excuse me, My Lord, it’s an

3 important document and I do have it at 172, but,

4 unfortunately, it’s been taken out and I just