22 willing to put their property up for sale for
23 $35,000 less than they had it on — less than they
24 took it off for four months earlier?
25 A No.
26 Q Mr. Hunter, I would put it to you that you didn’t
27 tell them you had Ms. Hundley as a — as a client
28 and that you told them you would get them the best
29 price possible. Is that not true?
30 A That is not true.
31 Q And that you convinced them to list their property
32 at a lower amount so that you — you told them
33 you’d get multiple offers, correct?
34 A No, that’s not correct.
Mr.Hunter altered the Exclusive Listing Contract after the Contract was signed by the Garniers.
Mr. Hunter – Examination for Discovery Transcripts, April 13, 2010
Page 92
2 517 Q And I believe it’s tab 9, it looks on this document,
3 tab 9 in the third party’s list of documents. It
4 looks on had this document it’s been changed to
5 920,000?
6 A That’s correct.
7 518 Q And you changed that?
8 A Yes, I did, at my suggestion.
25 522 Q And you understand that this is a legal document
Page 93
1 signed by to the Garniers?
2 A Yes.
3 523 Q Okay. And why did you not asking them to initial the
4 change?
5 A Well, it wasn’t necessary. You can see that a 1 was
6 very, very easily transformed into a 2. I mean, if
7 the number had been crossed out, was in any form
8 distorted then obviously it would have been
9 initialed.
10 524 Q So it’s your understanding if a change is easy it
11 doesn’t have to be initialed?
12 MR. BLANCHARD: Don’t answer that.
Mr. Hunter Trial transcripts Vol.4.
671 Raymond Hunter (a Third Party) Cross-exam by Mr. Davison
22 Q And at one point in this meeting, you make the
23 change on the terms of sale from 910 to 920,
24 correct?
25 A Yes.
26 Q Okay. And you understand this is a contract
27 between yourself and the Garniers?